a. YES. Since Doctor A did not consult either the family, the Mother or Father of the unborn child, or the immediate family present in the Hospital, and promptly proceeded with the Procedures, thus, violating the constitutional mandate of the right of the child and The Mother. Hence, the doctor would be guilty of abortion or murder.
b. YES. Doctor A did not exercise his profession carefully, that resulted to the death of the Unborn Child. Skilled health professional such as provincial, city or municipal health officers, chiefs of hospital, head nurses, supervising midwives, among others, who by virtue of their office are specifically charged with the duty to protect the life of unborn, as Mandated in our Constitution and Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012 (RH Law). Hence, the doctor would be guilty of abortion or murder.
c. NO. In a conflict situation between the life of the mother and the life of a child, the doctor is morally obliged always to try to save the life of the mother, regardless of the wills of any parties involved in making decision who will survive. Hence, the doctor would not be guilty of abortion or murder.
d. NO. Accordingly, if it is necessary to save the life of a mother, procedures endangering the life of the child may be resorted to even if is against the religious sentiments of the medical practitioner. Doctor A can act in favor of one (not necessarily the mother) when it is medically impossible to save both, provided that no direct harm is intended to the other. Hence, the doctor would not be guilty of abortion or murder.
TYPE THE ANSWER BELOW (a, b, c or d)